When life hands you lemons, you make…sure no one sees you pucker while you suck on one. That pretty much sums up Sony’s position on sales of the PlayStation Vita in Japan, which have plummeted since the device launched in the Land of the Rising Sun on December 17, 2011.

GameSpot ran into Sony’s director of hardware marketing John Koller at CES this week and got the following reaction:

If you look at the word-of-mouth factor, it’s really strong because people are bringing it home and really enjoying it. That satisfaction rate is really high. But also in terms of when we funnel in additional hardware units, that’ll dictate how many sales there are and how many sell through. We’re still in the first couple weeks, and we’re trying to get as many units into market as possible. We’re going to give it some time, but overall those numbers have been to forecast.

Everyone loves the Vita, and we just haven’t shipped enough hardware yet, in other words. Oh, and shipped numbers actually match forecast numbers! For Sony’s sake, let’s hope all (or most) of that’s true. While NPD just reported sales across all categories for both the Xbox 360 and the PS3 were up 5% in 2011, Sony shipped nearly three million fewer game consoles than Microsoft in the U.S. last year.

Perhaps the Vita’s going to follow the Nintendo 3DS’s trajectory, launching strong, suddenly falling off a cliff, then rebounding. Of course Nintendo helped things along by knocking $80 off the 3DS’s $249.99 launch price, bringing it back to DSi levels at $179.99.

The Vita with Wi-Fi’s going to sell for $249.99 when it launches in the U.S. at the end of next month — $299.99 if you want the Wi-Fi + 3G version — and Sony’s charging a premium for memory cards (the Vita has no internal memory): $30 for 4GB, $45 for 8GB, $70 for 16GB, and $120 for 32GB. Your total spend for one of these things could top $420 if you want the whole kaboodle. [Make that $400, per the update.]

[Update: The memory stick prices listed above are GameStop's original (apparently "made up") prices, which they've since dropped as follows: $25 for 4GB, $35 for 8GB, $60 for 16GB, and $100 for 32GB. Sony's price list for these is the same as GameStop's revised price list, save for the 4GB card, which Sony says will cost $20.]

Of course the Vita’s Japanese sales slump could also have something to do with how Sony says it’s timing game releases. Koller told GameSpot that the company “learned from past, most recent, handheld device launches,” and that it doesn’t “want to launch strongly and then go dark for three or four months and have nothing.” He’s referring to the 3DS launch mess, obviously, where Nintendo rolled out nearly two-dozen mostly forgettable games, then left gamers high and dry — punctuated briefly by a well-received Zelda remake last summer — until holiday majors like Super Mario 3D Land and Mario Kart 7 arrived.

View the original article here

 

The tower desktop is finished.

It had a long run, and has survived all kinds of threats–laptops, gaming consoles, netbooks, countless pundits like myself proclaiming its end. But seriously this time: it’s done. And ironically, the tower desktop got put down by a PC that actually sits on top of your desk.

Out With The Old

In 2011, all-in-one desktops went from being a novelty to becoming a palatable product category that served up a strong value and great performance in a compact case. So here’s my prediction for 2012, and the next few years: All-in-ones will be everywhere.

You’ll still find a few towers haunting store shelves. And they may even seem like a good deal–say, $400 for a 1TB hard drive, 4GB of RAM, and some middle of the road CPU from AMD or Intel. Pair that with your monitors and an existing set of keyboard and mice, and you’ll have a perfectly serviceable PC.

And also a relic of a bygone age.

Some of us need to tinker inside of our machines: Gamers like myself will still need giant cases for our graphics cards and liquid-cooled CPUs. Professionals will need workstations, and businesses will need machines that can be upgraded or repaired en masse. Drab black boxes will remain a mainstay in the corporate environment–for a little while longer, anyway.

But all-in-ones are the future. The average consumer just wants something that works, and works well–and it never hurts if it looks good or takes up a minimum amount of space. All-in-ones hit every single point with aplomb.

In With the New

Intel and AMD have helped speed up the shift toward all-in-ones by producing smaller, faster processors that cut down on power consumption while ramping up performance. The coming year will be no different, with Intel’s Ivy Bridge and AMD’s Piledriver paving the way for ever-thinner, ever-sleeker machines that don’t compromise on performance.

Lenovo’s IdeaCentre A720 folds down flat to make it easier to use its touchscreen.And then there’s touch. With Windows 7, you can shun touch completely and get along quite nicely. Even Windows 8 will allow you to stick with the traditional Windows desktop.

But more and more applications are being developed with touch in mind, and Windows 8 will be an Everywhere OS–application developers who don’t ship finger-friendly wares will suffer.

But even if you do hate the thought of tapping away at your PC’s screen, how does a massive, gorgeous display sound? Or getting rid of the rats nest of cables under your desk, and tidying up a bit? Or having a PC that’s actually worth showing off–a fairly priced workhorse that’s a joy to turn on, that feels a little bit like the oft-promised future?

All-in-ones can offer all of that.

But don’t take my word for it. Outside of the usual suspects that litter the Performance desktops category, you’d be hard pressed to find a manufacturer trying to show off a boring box in a sea of shiny, touchable tablets and smartphones.

I’ve said this time and time again: I love my desktop, a work in progress I’ve been tinkering with and upgrading for years. But most users just need a machine to host their photos, stream their movies, and play the occasional video game. All-in-Ones fit the bill, and do so in style. They’re here to stay, and I wouldn’t have it any other way.

View the original article here

 

Electric-vehicles can be much better for the environment–and they’re geekier–because you’re driving with pure energy. The biggest downside right now is that energy does not last very long with the smallish capacitance of lithium-ion car batteries that you have to charge overnight.

IBM is onto what it thinks is a breakthrough lithium-air battery that can theoretically store 1,000 times more energy than today’s lithium ion battery. The huge jump in energy density could effectively quintuple your electric vehicle’s range from 100 miles to 500 miles. Imagine a Nissan Leaf that can go 500 miles instead of 100 miles, or a Tesla Roadster that can go 125 miles per hour for more than 600 miles.

Unlike the batteries we have used in the past (lead acid, nickel metal hydride, and so on), Li-air batteries don’t use metal to conduct a charge. Instead, the energy flow is created from the air reacting with lithium ions and a carbon matrix. So while you drive, the battery literally breathes in air to produce more energy, which extends the range of a single charge.

This research on lithium-air batteries has been on going since 2009 when IBM first started the Battery 500 project.

The reason we are not using these magical, breathing batteries right now is because they are also chemically unstable, and as of right now, frequent recharges completely destroy the battery life. The researchers discovered that the oxygen is also reacting with in-turn depletes the electrolytic solvent, a conducting solution that moves Li-ions between the electrodes and regulates the chemical reaction.

Now researchers collaborating between IBM’s Almaden laboratories and Zurich research labs in Switzerland think they have found an alternative electrolytes that won’t react to the air. If everything turns out as promising as it seems, the scientists predict they will have a working prototype by 2013 and a commercial battery by 2020.

Of course, we really wouldn’t mind having longer lasting batteries in some of our everyday devices and laptops too.

View the original article here

Freemarket.com Marketplace
© 2012 TechNeats Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
Top